What distinguishes reactive policing from proactive policing?

Reactive policing is characterized by responses to incidents after they have occurred. This approach typically involves law enforcement agencies deploying resources to address criminal activities once they are reported or observed, rather than anticipating or preventing them beforehand. Hence, the defining feature of reactive policing is its nature of responding to crimes rather than preventing them.

In contrast to proactive policing, which focuses on strategies aimed at preventing crime before it happens, reactive policing does not involve preemptive measures or initiatives to deter potential criminal activity. Rather, it relies on investigations and responses that take place after a crime has been committed, such as responding to calls for service and conducting follow-up investigations.

Other options presented do not accurately define a distinguishing factor of reactive policing. While some might discuss the cost-effectiveness or higher arrest rates associated with different policing strategies, these aspects do not specifically capture the essence of what sets reactive policing apart. Furthermore, limiting reactive policing to traffic violations does not reflect its broader application across various types of crimes. Thus, the correct answer illustrates a fundamental characteristic of reactive policing effectively.